Thus, care needs to be used interpreting these results For anti-

Thus, care needs to be used interpreting these results. For anti-HPV-16 antibodies, the immune interference could be overcome by a change in vaccine formulation (either by increasing the dose of HPV-16 L1 VLPs, or by using a different adjuvant

system). In fact, a particularly high anti-HPV-16 antibody response was elicited when the tetravalent HPV-16/18/33/58 vaccine was adjuvanted with AS01 or AS02, compared with the control vaccine. This finding was supported by the detection of higher HPV-16 specific memory B-cell responses for formulations containing AS01 and AS02, although these adjuvant systems did not notably impact on HPV-16 specific CD4+ T-cell responses. An evaluation

of the interaction of specific CD4+ PCI-32765 concentration T-cell help for memory B-cell maturation and antibody affinity may shed some light on the results observed. The nature of the negative immune interference with regard to anti-HPV-18 humoral and cellular immunity was more complex and could not always be overcome by increasing the dose of HPV-18 L1 VLPs, or by using a different adjuvant system. Interestingly, we observed www.selleckchem.com/B-Raf.html that increasing the amount of HPV-31/45 VLPs from 10 μg to 20 μg did improve the anti-HPV-18 immunogenicity of a tetravalent HPV-16/18/31/45 vaccine, although anti-HPV-18 GMTs were still lower than those elicited by the control vaccine. This was presumably because of enhanced induction of cross-reactive HPV-18 antibodies induced by HPV-45 (both are A7 species of HPV). As expected, we found that specific antibody responses to the additional HPV L1 VLPs introduced in the tetravalent vaccines (HPV-31 and -45 or HPV-33 and -58) were significantly

higher compared with cross-reacting antibodies induced by the control vaccine. However, it is not possible to predict from the two studies reported herein whether enhanced immune responses with polyvalent vaccines against a broader range of oncogenic HPV types will translate into higher clinical efficacy than previously reported [11]. Although the precise contribution of HPV-16, Oxygenase -33 and -58 to cross-reactivity against other species of HPV (HPV-31 and HPV-52) cannot be defined, it is clear that adjuvantation with AS01 has a major impact on the cross-reactive behavior of the tetravalent HPV-16/18/33/58 vaccine. A tentative explanation for this relates to the ability of AS01 to stimulate the innate immune response, to enhance or modulate antigen-specific antibody and T cell-mediated responses [13]. Major type-specific regions on HPV L1 VLPs that are surface exposed and conformation dependent have been identified for a few HPV types, but very little is known about the regions of HPV L1 VLPs important for cross-reactivity [27].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>