The cut-off GS-9973 chemical structure frequency f T is defined as the

frequency at which the current gain becomes unity and indicates the maximum frequency at which signals can be propagated in the transistor. Once both gate capacitance and transconductance are calculated, f T can be computed using the quasi-static approximation [38, 39]. (15) It should be noted that a rigorous treatment beyond quasi-static approximation requires the inclusion of capacitive, resistive, and inductive elements in the calculation. In Figure 5, the quantity f T L G, where L G is the channel length, as function of V G, for increasing values of uniaxial tensile stain, is depicted. Assuming a channel length of less than L G=50 nm, f T Dactolisib exceeds the THz barrier

throughout the bias window, confirming the excellent high-frequency potential of GNRs. Furthermore, Figures 10 and 11 show the variation of cutoff frequency versus gate voltage and strain ε (in the on-state), respectively. We clearly observe that f T increases rapidly until the turning point ε≃7% and then decreases with lower rate for higher strain values (ε>7%). This is a direct consequence of both transconductance and gate capacitance variations with strain. Therefore, the high-frequency performance of AGNR-FETs improves with tensile uniaxial strain, before the LOXO-101 manufacturer ‘turning point’ of band gap variation but becomes worse after this point. Figure 10 Dependence of ( f T L G ) on V GS for various uniaxial strains. The drain voltage is held constant at 0.5 V. Figure 11 Variation of ( ) with uniaxial tensile strain in the ‘on-state’ V GS = V DS =0 . 5 V. Lastly, we study the effect of strain on the switching performance of the DG-GNR FET. Figures 12, 13, and 14 show the dependence of I on, I off and I on/I off ratio on the uniaxial

tensile strain, respectively. As it is clearly seen, the variation of both I on and I off is opposite to the variation of the band gap with strain whereas Adenosine triphosphate the ratio I on/I off changes with strain following the band gap variation. The on-current I on changes almost linearly with strain whereas the I off and the ratio I on/I off changes almost exponentially with strain. Note that the corresponding curves are not symmetric around the turning point, e.g., although for ε=12%, the GNR band gap returns to its unstrained value; the drain current at this stain value does not completely return to that of the unstrained GNR. This can be explained by the fact that although the band gap has returned its unstrained value, the carrier group velocity has been modified because, under tensile strain, some C-C bonds of the AGNR have been elongated [9]. Figure 15 shows the I on versus I on/I off plots for various strains which provides a useful guide for selecting device characteristics that can yield a desirable I on/I off under strain.