Short-axis, mid-left ventricular (LV) echocardiography was performed on Day 6 after transplantation. Conventional measures of function were measured, (including LV fractional shortening and ejection fraction) as well as 2DSE parameters.

RESULTS: Despite class IIIB rejection in allografts and no rejection in isografts,

there was no difference between isografts vs allografts in fractional shortening (15% +/- 3% vs 12% +/- 3%) or ejection fraction (36% +/- 5% vs 26% +/- 6%; both not significant). In contrast, 2DSE revealed decreases between isografts and allografts in global radial strain (12.6% +/- 5.6% vs 1.1% +/- 0.2%, p < 0.05), peak radial systolic strain rate (3.10 +/- 0.74/s vs 0.54 +/- 0.13/s, p < 0.001), and peak circumferential systolic strain rate (-1.99 +/- 0.55 vs -0.43 +/- 0.11/s; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Systolic strain imaging using 2DSE differentiates Selleck GANT61 myocardial function between experimental cardiac transplant rejection in allografts and non-rejection in isografts. Therefore, 2DSE may be useful in early non-invasive detection of transplant rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:1039-46 (C) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation All rights reserved.”
“Purpose

The objective of this study is to evaluate the longitudinal construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) using check details a convergent/divergent validity approach in patients recovering from hip fracture, with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) as the comparator.

A total of 278 patients with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture were interviewed 3-5 days after surgery and then at 1 and 6 months using the HUI2, HUI3 and the FIM and a Likert-type rating of hip pain. A priori hypotheses were formulated. Convergent and divergent correlations between HUI2, HUI3 and FIM change scores for the baseline to 1-month and baseline to 6-month intervals were examined.

Overall HUI2 detected

continued gain in health-related quality of life between 1 and 6 months after fracture, as the change increased from 0.20 to 0.29 units. The correlation between change in the overall HUI2 score and total FIM score was moderate (r = 0.50) over the 6-month interval, but larger than the observed correlation over the 1-month interval (r = 0.36). The correlation GM6001 cell line between change in overall HUI3 score and total FIM over the 1-month interval was small (r = 0.32), and the correlation between change in overall HUI3 score and total FIM was moderate (r = 0.37) over the 6-month interval. All hypotheses for the divergent correlations were supported.

Weaker correlations were reported for change over 1 month as compared to change over the 6 months after fracture. Findings supported the longitudinal construct validity of the overall HUI2 and HUI3 for the assessment of recovery following hip fracture, particularly for change over the 6 months following fracture.