Rotarix is a monovalent vaccine derived from human serotype G1P1A[8], whilst RotaTeq is a pentavalent human-bovine reassortant vaccine derived from human serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4 and P1A[8]. Potential differences between the two vaccines with respect to their efficacy against each of the most prevalent circulating serotypes has not been explored by our model as we did not incorporate information on rotavirus serotypes. There are limitations to the model. Our model does not take into account diversity of rotavirus strains in circulation or that immunity to re-infection

Ipatasertib research buy will depend, in part, on the strains causing infection and re-infection [15]. However, in England and Wales the G1P[8] strain dominates each year [39]. In addition, a degree of heterotypic immunity along with serotype-specific protection is conferred by a previous infection

[15]. Therefore, we felt that not including strain diversity was justified in the context of England and Wales so not to over complicate the model. However, vaccine pressure leading to the emergence of new strains may influence the long-term outcomes of vaccination, and therefore it is important to collect information on rotavirus strains post-vaccination. In summary, we have developed a model of rotavirus transmission for England and Wales which successfully captures the observed seasonal pattern and age-profile of rotavirus disease. Vaccination effects predicted are in keeping with those observed in the United States and suggest that introducing selleck kinase inhibitor rotavirus vaccination in England and Wales could reduce the overall burden of disease by 61% if coverage levels comparable to other childhood vaccines are achieved. This dramatic

fall in disease incidence would more than likely result in a fall Urease in burden on health-care services attributable to rotavirus gastroenteritis. This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council to Dr Atchison. The funding body had no role in the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of the study. The views and opinions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the funding body. “
“In recent decades, vaccination has become an essential component of public health programs and is a decisive factor in controlling numerous infectious diseases [1]. In Japan, Sweden and England and Wales [2], a drastic reduction in the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases has increased the perceived risk of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs), which has resulted in lower vaccination coverage [1] and [2]. As early as the 1980s, concerns raised by this situation prompted countries such as United States, Canada, Cuba, India and New Zealand as well as European Union Member States to implement surveillance for adverse events following immunization (SAEFI) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and [8].