A literature search was performed to identify rFVIIa-treated patients with GT. Overall, one international survey, one open-label study, and 40 case reports identified 172 bleeding episodes treated with rFVIIa and 62 procedures covered with rFVIIa. In the international survey, rFVIIa BI was used for 96 bleeding episodes in 59 patients. Recombinant FVIIa

was effective in 76 bleeding episodes (79%). Of 34 surgical procedures, 25 procedures received rFVIIa BI with 92% bleeding-prevention efficacy. The open-label study reported 28 patients with 28 rFVIIa BI-treated bleeds, and 26 (93%) bleeding episodes responded to rFVIIa. Published case reports revealed that CX-4945 mw 25 (69%) of 36 bleeds and 27 (96%) of 28 surgeries responded to rFVIIa BI treatment. Overall, 26 adverse events were reported in 19 patients, including five thromboembolic events in two patients where a possible relationship with rFVIIa could not be excluded. Two large studies and this website 40 case reports provide a literature base to support the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa BI in patients

with GT. “
“Summary.  The primary goal of prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia is to convert the phenotype from severe to moderate and to prevent the development of chronic arthropathy. Prior studies have demonstrated that prophylaxis decreases episodes of joint bleeds and chronic arthropathy. Effectiveness depends on prescription of prophylaxis and adherence to the prescribed regimen. The aim of this study was to determine if prescription of prophylaxis for children with haemophilia and perceptions of adherence to prophylaxis have changed since publication of the Joint Outcome Study (JOS). A questionnaire was sent, in electronic and written formats, to health professionals who provide care to children with haemophilia at US haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs). The response rate was 56 of 128 (44%) of the targeted (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate HTCs. There were a few missing data and denominators are

provided. All responses agreed with the results of the JOS and 30/55 (55%) reported the JOS increased their prescription of prophylaxis. Nineteen of 56 (34%) physicians or HTC staff reported that they had not prescribed prophylaxis within the last year due to concerns about adherence, and 19/56 (34%) reported they had stopped prophylaxis due to concerns about adherence within the last year. Predicted adherence decreased with increasing age. Prescription of prophylaxis appears to be increasing since publication of the JOS. Strategies to improve adherence may increase the likelihood of physician prescription of prophylaxis and make prophylaxis easier to implement for individual patients, thereby improving the clinical outcome of children and adults with haemophilia. “
“Summary.