We thank M.E. Hasselmo, E. Kropff, T. Solstad, and E.A. Zilli for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship, the Kavli Foundation, and a Centre of Excellence grant from the Research Council of Norway. “
“Comparative and pathological studies suggest the mammalian cerebral cortex to be the anatomical substrate of higher cognitive functions including language, episodic memory, and voluntary movement (Jones and Rakic, 2010, Kaas, 2008 and Rakic, 2009). The cerebral cortex has a uniform laminar structure that historically has been divided into six layers (Brodmann, 1909). The upper layers (1 to 4) form localized

Selleckchem INCB024360 intracortical connections (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1979 and Toyama et al., 1974) and are thought to process information locally. The deep layers of the cortex, 5 and 6, LGK-974 research buy form longer-distance projections to subcortical targets (including the thalamus, striatum, basal pons, tectum, and spinal cord) and to the opposite hemisphere. Some layer 5 neurons are among the largest cells of the brain and exhibit the longest connections. Layer 6b in mouse neocortex is a distinct sublamina with characteristic connections, gene expression patterns, and physiological

properties (Hoerder-Suabedissen et al., 2009 and Kanold and Luhmann, 2010). Understanding how neurons and glia are organized into layers to assemble into functional microcircuits (Douglas and Martin, 2004) is one of the first steps that will be required to relate anatomical structures to cellular functions. Subclasses of pyramidal neurons

and interneurons populate specific layers, each characterized by a different depth in the cortex with a specific pattern of dendritic and axonal connectivity (Jones, 2000, Lorente de No, 1949 and Peters and Yilmaz, 1993). However, Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase analyzing these laminar differences is difficult and often suffers from subjectivity (Zilles and Amunts, 2010). The currently available repertoire of markers that allow the distinction of cortical layers and of many neuronal and glial subtypes is rapidly improving because of developments in cell sorting and gene expression analysis (Doyle et al., 2008, Heintz, 2004, Miller et al., 2010, Molyneaux et al., 2007, Monyer and Markram, 2004, Nelson et al., 2006, Thomson and Bannister, 2003 and Winden et al., 2009). These molecular tags allow highly specific classes of neurons and glia to be monitored, modulated, or eliminated, thereby providing greater insights into cortical neurogenesis and the classification of lamina specific subclasses of cells. Laminar molecular markers were first identified by studying single protein-coding genes (Hevner et al., 2006, Molyneaux et al., 2007 and Yoneshima et al., 2006) but more recently, high-throughput in situ hybridization (Hawrylycz et al., 2010, Lein et al., 2007 and Ng et al., 2010) and microarrays (Oeschger et al., 2011, Arlotta et al.