80–0.83 0.81 (0.81) 12.80–14.11 13.56 (13.53) NS NS

−0.0028–0.0104 0.0026 (0.0009) * NS 0.0143 (0.006) Northern pike (Esox lucius) 10 315 11 0.57–0.66 (0.60) 4.33–4.78 (4.50) * 0.0065–0.0825 (0.0325) *** (0.0881) European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) 10 346 12 0.67–0.77 073 (0.74) 4.17–5.43 4.84 (4.90) ** * −0.0021–0.1114 0.0402 (0.0346) *** *** 0.1365 (0.1074) Three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) 10 337 16 0.73–0.77 0.76 (0.75) 8.70–9.71 9.20 (9.15) NS –0.0036−0.0175 0.0028 (0.0004) *** ** 0.0115 (0.0028) Nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) 8 230 19 0.51–0.60 0.57 (0.59) 3.97–5.77 5.31 (5.36) * * 0.0016–0.1905 0.0783 (0.0307) *** *** 0.1605 (0.0826) Blue mussel (Mytilus trossulus) 8 239 10 0.07–0.31 0.21 (0.24) 1.40–2.00 1.86 (1.92) GF120918 mw *** *** −0.0045–0.8300 0.4672 (0.2789) *** *** 0.5769 (0.3447) Bladderwrack (Fucus vesiculosus) 8 239 7 0.50–0.72 0.60 (0.58) 2.58–4.71 3.55 (3.40) *** *** 0.02900–0.2800 0.1428 (0.166) *** *** 0.3483 (0.3649) H e is heterozygosity expected from Hardy–Weinberg proportions, the range

as well as the average for the total material (outside www.selleckchem.com/products/BIBF1120.html of parenthesis) and the average for the Baltic samples only (within parenthesis). F ST represents the fixation index indicating the amount of genetic differentiation between the sampling localities (Weir and Cockerham 1984) with the range pairwise indicating the lower and upper values of pairwise FSTs. G ST ′ is an GSK2245840 purchase equivalent to F ST standardized for heterozygosity (Hedrick (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate 1999; Ryman and Leimar 2008). Differences in allelic richness between sampling sites were tested with a median test and statistical tests of overall genetic heterogeneity were conducted using the χ 2 method in the software Chifish (Ryman 2006) * 0.05 > p > 0.01, ** 0.01 > p > 0.001, *** 0.001 > p. Values for H e, allelic richness, F ST, G ST ′ outside of parenthesis refer to the total material including samples from the Atlantic, and values in parenthesis refer to Baltic samples only Fig. 2 Diversity-divergence patterns and the three strongest barriers to gene flow. Diversity is shown in left

part of the circles; dark higher diversity than average, light lower diversity. Divergence is shown in the right part of the figures; dark higher divergence than average, light lower divergence. Populations sampled outside the Baltic Sea were not included in diversity-divergence analyses and are shown as white circles with a dot. Barriers supported by more than half of the investigated loci are indicated with solid lines, and barriers supported by less than half of the loci are indicated with dotted lines. Barriers indicated here are supported also by traditional F ST statistics (cf. Table S2a–g). For bladderwrack there is also an indication of a barrier to gene flow at the entrance to the Baltic Sea, but it is not included among the three strongest barriers depicted here (cf. Table S2g).