7 +/- 4.9 ng/ml) compared to the HC group (15.1 +/- 5.5 ng/ml, p=0.04) and also compared

to the ANRec group (17.6 +/- 4.8 ng/ml, p=0.001). The AN group made significantly more errors (total and perseverative) in the WCST relative to the HC group. There was no significant correlation between serum BDNF concentrations and performance on the WCST.\n\nConclusions. Serum BDNF may be a biological marker for eating-related psychopathology and of recovery in AN. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore possible associations between serum BDNF concentrations, illness and recovery and neuropsychological traits.”
“We discuss potential caveats when estimating topologies of 3D brain networks from surface recordings. It is virtually Kinase Inhibitor Library impossible to record activity from all single neurons in the brain and one has to rely on techniques that measure average activity at sparsely

located (non-invasive) recording sites Effects of this spatial sampling in relation to structural network measures like centrality and assortativity were analyzed using multivariate classifiers find more A simplified model of 3D brain connectivity incorporating both short- and long-range connections served for testing. To mimic M/EEG recordings we sampled this model via non-overlapping regions and weighted nodes and connections according to their proximity to the recording sites We used various complex network models for reference and tried to classify sampled versions of the “brain-like” AZD8055 datasheet network as one of these archetypes It was found that sampled networks may substantially deviate in topology from the respective original networks for small sample sizes For experimental studies this may imply that surface recordings can yield network structures that might not agree with its generating 3D network. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved”
“Objective\n\nThis paper presents the final analysis

of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) vs. lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults.\n\nMethods\n\nSubjects; NCT00258557) was a randomized, open-label, phase-III, 192-week trial. Patients were stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count, and randomized to once-daily DRV/r 800/100?mg or LPV/r 800/200?mg total daily dose (either once or twice daily) plus tenofovir/emtricitabine.\n\nResults\n\nOf 689 randomized patients receiving treatment (DRV/r: 343; LPV/r: 346), 85 and 114 patients in the DRV/r and LPV/r arms, respectively, had discontinued by week 192. Noninferiority was shown in the primary endpoint of virological response (HIV-1 RNA?<?50 copies/mL) [DRV/r: 68.8%; LPV/r: 57.2%; P?<?0.001; intent to treat (ITT)/time to loss of virological response; estimated difference in response 11.6% (95% confidence interval 4.418.8%)]. Statistical superiority in virological response of DRV/r over LPV/r was demonstrated for the primary endpoint (P?=?0.002) and for the ITT non-virological-failure-censored analysis (87.4% vs. 80.8%, respectively; P?=?0.040).