Staining of CIP2A was also detected in epithelial cells of the hyperplastic epithelium (Figure 1). However, while in most cancer specimens (73%) the staining pattern
was SC79 research buy a coarse granular cytoplasmic positivity of moderate or strong intensity, the hyperplastic samples only stained weakly in an almost uniform manner (90%). For further analysis, CIP2A immunopositivity was divided into negative (score 0-1) vs. positive (scores 2-3) subgroups. The staining scores in the benign and malignant prostate specimens are presented in Table 2, which shows that CIP2A expression was significantly higher in prostate cancer specimens than in hyperplastic specimens (p < 0.001). In conclusion, these results suggest that expression of the CIP2A protein is increased in the epithelial cell compartments of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the prostate cancer patients Gleason score n (%) 4-6 21 (35.6) 7 15 (25.4) 8-10 23 (39.0) PSA (ng/ml) mean (SD) Radical prostatectomy patients (n = 31) 9.1 (5.0) Other prostate cancer patients (n = 28) 59 (169) Preoperative CA4P supplier risk group n (%) Low-risk
group (cT1a-cT2a, N0, M0 and Gleason score ≤6 and PSA <10 ng/mL) 7 (22.6) Intermediate-risk group (cT2b or PSA 10-20 ng/mL or Gleason score 7) 16 (51.6) High-risk group (cT2c or higher or Gleason score >7 or PSA >20 ng/mL) 8 (25.8) Figure 1 Expression of CIP2A in benign prostatic hyperplasia and in prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical detection of CIP2A protein
expression in benign prostatic hyperplasia specimens (A) and in prostate cancer specimens (B-C). The representative Gleason scores of 6 (B) and 9 (C) are presented. Diffuse, weak cytoplasmic staining of CIP2A was present in hyperplastic tissues, whereas the staining pattern in cancer cells buy Temsirolimus showed coarsely granular cytoplasmic positivity. Magnification × 100, and in inserts × 400. Table 2 CIP2A immunostaining intensity in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Palbociclib molecular weight CIP2A immunostaining n negative positive Hyperplasia 20 18 (90.0%) 2 (10.0%) Prostate cancer 59 16 (27.1%) 43 (72.9%) p < 0.001 (Fisher’s exact test) CIP2A expression is increased in aggressive prostate tumors The staining intensity of CIP2A increased with increasing Gleason score, as the mean Gleason scores for CIP2A-negative and positive tumors were 5.5 and 8.0, respectively (p < 0.001). When the tumor specimens were stratified according to their clinically relevant Gleason scores as low risk and high risk tumors, there were significantly more CIP2A-positive cases among tumors with Gleason scores of 7-10 compared to those with Gleason scores of 6 or less (Table 3; p < 0.001). We further evaluated the association between CIP2A staining and pre-treatment clinical prostate cancer risk group stratification based on PSA values, Gleason scores and clinical tumor staging [7] among patients treated by radical prostatectomy (n = 31). There were 2 (28.6%), 10 (62.