Together with the results of a parallel event-related potential s

Together with the results of a parallel event-related potential study [Hayama, H. R., Johnson, J. D., & Rugg, M. D. (2008). The relationship between the right frontal old/new ERP effect and post-retrieval monitoring: Specific or non-specific? Neuropsychologia,

46(5),1211-1223, doi:S0028-3932(07)00390-9], the present findings indicate that putative right DLPFC correlates of post-retrieval processing are not associated exclusively with monitoring or evaluating episodic content. BX-795 cost Rather, the effects likely reflect processing associated with monitoring or decision-making in multiple cognitive domains. Published by Elsevier Ltd.”
“The contralesional line bisection error in hemianopia is a well-known clinical phenomenon. Its origin, however, is still unclear. We therefore investigated the causes of the hemianopic bisection error in 84 patients with unilateral homonymous hemianopia without visuospatial neglect. Our results suggest that the contralesional bisection error is neither a consequence of the visual AZD5363 ic50 field defect itself nor a manifestation of strategic adaptation

of attention and eye movements into contralesional hemispace. Additional extrastriate brain injury, presumably to occipito-temporal areas including the occipital white matter, seems to be critical for the emergence of the contralesional bisection error that is frequently associated with but separable from homonymous hemianopia. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“There are substantial individual differences in the size and shape of the corpus callosum and such differences are thought to relate to behavioral lateralization. We report findings from a large scale investigation of relationships between brain anatomy and behavioral asymmetry on a battery of visual word recognition tasks. A sample of 200 individuals was divided into groups on the basis of sex and consistency of handedness. We investigated differences between sex/handedness groups in callosal area and relationships between

callosal area and behavioral predictors. Sex/handedness groups did not show systematic differences in callosal area or behavioral asymmetry. However, the groups differed in the relationships between area of the corpus callosum and behavioral asymmetry. Among consistent-handed males, callosal area GABA Receptor was negatively related to behavioral laterality. Among mixed-handed males and consistent-handed females, behavioral laterality was not predictive of callosal area. The most robust relationship was observed in mixed-handed females, in whom behavioral asymmetry was positively related to callosal area. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering brain/behavior relationships within sub-populations, as relationships between behavioral asymmetry and callosal anatomy varied across subject groups. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>